FROM EDITORIAL BOARD
EDITORIAL BOARD
EDITORIAL ETHICS
CONTACT INFORMATION
SEARCH
EXTENDED SEARCH
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVE
FORMATING A MANUSCRIPT
PEER REVIEW POLICY
MANUSCRIPT CONSIDERATION
SAMPLES
SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION
OUR AUTHORS
HELPFUL LINKS
PEER REVIEW POLICY
Peer review is one of the supporting documents which authors submit along with the manuscript according to the Order of MES of Ukraine #1111 dated 17.10.2012, art.2.11 and 3.1. Manuscripts undergo peer reviewing in order to provide the journal with articles of high quality.
Manuscripts of both post-graduate students and candidates for a doctoral degree must have a peer review provided by a Doctor of Science. Manuscripts of Candidates of Sciences must have a peer review provided by a Ph.D., associate professor or head researcher. Manuscripts of Doctors of Sciences require no peer review. Your colleague from the same department of faculty CAN'T be accepted as a reviwer.
Reviewers provide their peer review in written where they point out the following:
- evaluation of the problem described in the manuscript and its relevance to the subject-matter of the journal;
- evaluation of the manuscript itself: given scientific theses and results; novelty of the scientific theses and results; relevance of the scientific theses and results;
- remarks on the manuscript presentation and formatting;
- suggestions on necessary alterations in the text;
- conclusion on publication possibility.
The reviewer's surname must be typed at the end of the article in Bulletin of KhSADA. A peer review must have a reviewer's signature and a stamp of the personnel department where the reviewer works. The manuscript with a reviewer's signature must be stored at the editorial office for 2 years.